Optimal Prone Position Duration in Patients With ARDS Due to COVID-19: The Omelette Pilot Trial.

BACKGROUND: Prone position (PP) has been widely used in the COVID-19 pandemic for ARDS management. However, the optimal length of a PP session is still controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of prolonged versus standard PP duration in subjects with ARDS due to COVID-19. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized controlled, parallel, and open pilot trial including adult subjects diagnosed with severe ARDS due to COVID-19 receiving invasive mechanical ventilation that met criteria for PP between March-September 2021. Subjects were randomized to the intervention group of prolonged PP (48 h) versus the standard of care PP (∼16 h). The primary outcome variable for the trial was ventilator-free days (VFDs) to day 28. RESULTS: We enrolled 60 subjects. VFDs were not significantly different in the standard PP group (18 [interquartile range [IQR] 0-23] VFDs vs 7.5 [IQR 0-19.0] VFDs; difference, -10.5 (95% CI -3.5 to 19.0, P = .08). Prolonged PP was associated with longer time to successful extubation in survivors (13.00 [IQR 8.75-26.00] d vs 8.00 [IQR 5.00-10.25] d; difference, 5 [95% CI 0-15], P = .001). Prolonged PP was also significantly associated with longer ICU stay (18.5 [IQR 11.8-25.3] d vs 11.50 [IQR 7.75-25.00] d, P = .050) and extended administration of neuromuscular blockers (12.50 [IQR 5.75-20.00] d vs 5.0 [IQR 2.0-14.5] d, P = .005). Prolonged PP was associated with significant muscular impairment according to lower Medical Research Council values (59.6 [IQR 59.1-60.0] vs 56.5 [IQR 54.1-58.9], P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Among subjects with severe ARDS due to COVID-19, there was no difference in 28-d VFDs between prolonged and standard PP strategy. However, prolonged PP was associated with a longer ICU stay, increased use of neuromuscular blockers, and greater muscular impairment. This suggests that prolonged PP is not superior to the current recommended standard of care.

Impact of a Hospitalist Co-Management Program on Medical Complications and Length of Stay in Neurosurgical Patients.

BACKGROUND: The impact of co-management on clinical outcomes in neurosurgical patients is uncertain. This study aims to describe the implementation of a hospitalist co-management program in a neurosurgery department and its impact on the incidence of complications, mortality, and length of stay. METHODS: The authors used a quasi-experimental study design that compared a historical control period (July-December 2017) to a prospective intervention arm. During the intervention period, patients admitted to a neurosurgery inpatient unit who were older than 65 years, suffered certain conditions, or were admitted from ICUs were included in the co-management program. Two hospitalists joined the surgical staff and intervened in the diagnostic and therapeutical plan of patients, participating in clinical decisions and coordinating patient navigation with neurosurgeons. The incidence of moderate or severe complications measured by the Accordion Severity Grading System, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay of the two cohorts were compared. Multivariate regression was used to adjust for confounders, and the average treatment effect was estimated using inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: The adjusted incidence of moderate or severe complications was lower among co-managed patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.91). Mortality was unchanged (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.15-4.17). Length of stay was lower in co-managed patients, with a 1.3-day reduction observed after inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis. CONCLUSION: Hospitalist co-management was associated with a reduced incidence of complications and length of stay in neurosurgical patients, but there was no difference in in-hospital mortality.

Shock Index and Physiological Stress Index for reestratifying patients with intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism.

OBJECTIVE: Study and Evaluation of Two Scores: Shock Index (SI) and Physiological Stress Index (PSI) as discriminators for proactive treatment (reperfusion before decompensated shock) in a population of intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE). DESIGN: Using a database from a retrospective cohort with clinical variables and the outcome variable of "proactive treatment", a comparison of the populations was conducted. Optimal cut-off for "proactive treatment" points were obtained according to the SI and PSI. Comparisons were carried out based on the cut-off points of both indices. SETTING: Patients admitted to a mixed ICU for PE. PARTICIPANTS: Patients >18 years old admitted to the ICU with intermediate-high risk PE recruited from January 2015 to October 2022. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Population comparison and metrics regarding predictive capacity when determining proactive treatment. RESULTS: SI and PSI independently have a substandard predictive capacity for discriminating patients who may benefit from an early reperfusion therapy. However, their combined use improves detection of sicker intermediate-high risk PE patients (Sensitivity = 0.66) in whom an early reperfusion therapy may improve outcomes (Specificity = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the SI and PSI in patients with intermediate-high risk PE could be useful for selecting patients who would benefit from proactive treatment.

Postoperative Blood Pressure Deficit and Acute Kidney Injury After Liver Transplant.

OBJECTIVES: Acute kidney injury is a common cause of morbidity in liver transplant recipients. In critically ill patients who received an orthotopic liver transplant, we examined whether those with acute kidney injury had a greater deficit between pretransplant and posttransplant hemodynamic pressure-related parameters compared with those without acute kidney injury in the early postoperative period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients who underwent an orthotopic liver transplant during the study period. We obtained premorbid and intensive care unit time-weighted average values for hemodynamic pressure-related parameters (systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure; central venous pressure; mean perfusion pressure; and diastolic perfusion pressure) and calculated deficits in those values. We defined acute kidney injury progression as an increase of ≥1 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stage. RESULTS: We included 150 eligible transplantrecipients, with 88 (59%) having acute kidney injury progression. Acute kidney injury was associated with worse clinical outcomes. All achieved pressure-related values were similar between transplant recipients with or without acute kidney injury progression. However, those with acute kidney injury versus those without progression had greater diastolic perfusion pressure deficit at 12 hours (-8.33% vs 1.93%; P = .037) and 24 hours (-7.38% vs 5.11%; P = .002) and increased central venous pressure at 24 hours (46.13% vs 15%; P = .043) and 48 hours (40% vs 20.87%; P = .039). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acute kidney injury progression had a greater diastolic perfusion pressure deficit and increased central venous pressure compared with patients without progression. Such deficits might be modifiable risk factors for the prevention of acute kidney injury progression.

Combination of arterial lactate levels and Cv-aCO2/Da-vO2 ratio to predict early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation.

PURPOSE: We examined the ability of the P(v-a)CO2/Da-vO2 ratio combined with elevated lactate levels to predict early allograft dysfunction (EAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were classified into four groups according to lactate levels and P(v-a)CO2/Da-vO2 ratio: Group 1; lactate >2.0 mmol/L and P(v-a)CO2/Da-vO2 ratio >1.0; Group 2; lactate >2.0 mmol/L and P(v-a)CO2/Da-vO2 ratio <1.0; group 3; lactate<2.0 mmol/L and P(v-a)CO2/Da-vO2 ratio >1.0; group 4; lactate<2.0 mmol/L and P(v-a)CO2/Da-vO2 ratio <1.0. We defined EAD according to Olthoff criteria. RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty patients were included. EAD occurred in 41 patients (27.3%), and was associated with worse graft survival at 1 year (92% vs. 73%; P = ,003) as well as a higher re-transplantation rate (4,6% vs. 17,1%; P = ,019). The multivariate analysis revealed that P(v-a)CO2/Da-vO2 ratio at T6 [OR 7.05(CI95% 2.77-19.01, P<.001)] was an independent predictor for EAD. Belonging to group 1 at 6 h was associated with worse clinical outcomes but no association was found with 1-year graft survival or 1-year patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this single center, prospective, observational study in patients who received an OLT, we found that elevated lactate levels combined with a high Cv-aCO2/Da-vO2 after 6 h was associated with the development of EAD and worse clinical outcomes in the early postoperative period.

Aplicación de la nueva definición Sepsis-3 en una cohorte de pacientes con sepsis grave y shock séptico ingresados en unidad de cuidados intensivos desde el Servicio de Urgencias / Application of the new Sepsis-3 definition in a cohort of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock admitted to Intensive Care Unit from the Emergency Department

Antecedentes y objetivo: Tras la publicación de la nueva definición de sepsis y shock séptico, nuestro objetivo es analizar la evolución de los pacientes que ingresan en UCI por enfermedad infecciosa utilizando la definición clásica y los nuevos criterios. Material y métodos: Subanálisis de un estudio observacional y prospectivo. Incluye a 98 pacientes ingresados en UCI por enfermedad infecciosa desde Urgencias durante 18 meses. Se estudió la evolución clínica en UCI y la mortalidad hospitalaria. Resultados: El 78% de los pacientes tuvieron shock séptico con la definición Sepsis-2 y el 52% con los criterios Sepsis-3. La mortalidad hospitalaria fue del 29 y del 41%, respectivamente. El RR de mortalidad hospitalaria de los pacientes con shock séptico fue 10,3 (IC 95%: 2,8-37,5) respecto a los pacientes sin shock. La probabilidad de supervivencia a los 30 días de los pacientes con sepsis y shock séptico fue del 78 y 68%, respectivamente (long Rank < 0,001). Conclusiones: En nuestra experiencia, la incorporación de la puntuación SOFA y el lactato a la nueva definición puede mejorar la valoración del riesgo de muerte hospitalaria

Background and objectives: After the publication of the new definition for sepsis and septic shock, our objective is to analyse the evolution of patients admitted to ICU with an infection process using the previous and new recommendations. Materials and methods: This is a sub-analysis of a previous observational prospective study. We included 98 patients admitted to ICU from the emergency department due to infection during an 18-month period. We studied the clinical evolution during ICU admission and hospital mortality. Results: According to Sepsis-2 definition, 78% percent had septic shock and using Sepsis-3 criteria, 52%; hospital mortality was 29 and 41%, respectively. The RR of hospital mortality of septic shock was 10.3 (95% CI: 2.8-37.5) compared to patients without shock. The 30-day probability survival of patients with sepsis and septic shock were 78% and 68%, respectively (long rank < 0.001). Conclusions: In our experience, the incorporation of the SOFA score and lactate levels to the new definition could help improve the evaluation of risk of hospital death

Application of the new Sepsis-3 definition in a cohort of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock admitted to Intensive Care Unit from the Emergency Department. / Aplicación de la nueva definición Sepsis-3 en una cohorte de pacientes con sepsis grave y shock séptico ingresados en unidad de cuidados intensivos desde el Servicio de Urgencias.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: After the publication of the new definition for sepsis and septic shock, our objective is to analyse the evolution of patients admitted to ICU with an infection process using the previous and new recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a sub-analysis of a previous observational prospective study. We included 98 patients admitted to ICU from the emergency department due to infection during an 18-month period. We studied the clinical evolution during ICU admission and hospital mortality. RESULTS: According to Sepsis-2 definition, 78% percent had septic shock and using Sepsis-3 criteria, 52%; hospital mortality was 29 and 41%, respectively. The RR of hospital mortality of septic shock was 10.3 (95% CI: 2.8-37.5) compared to patients without shock. The 30-day probability survival of patients with sepsis and septic shock were 78% and 68%, respectively (long rank < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the incorporation of the SOFA score and lactate levels to the new definition could help improve the evaluation of risk of hospital death.

Utility of SOFA and Δ-SOFA scores for predicting outcome in critically ill patients from the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: The condition of critically ill patients in the emergency department (ED) varies from moment to moment. The aims of this study are to quantify sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and changes in SOFA scores over time and determine its prognostic impact. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective observational cohort study. We included 269 patients consecutively admitted to the ICU from the ED over 18 months. The SOFA scores at ED admission (ED-SOFA) and ICU admission (ICU-SOFA) were obtained. Relative changes in SOFA scores were calculated as follows: Δ-SOFA=ICU-SOFA-ED-SOFA. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the Δ-SOFA score: (a) Δ-SOFA=0-1; and (b) Δ-SOFA more than or equal to 2. RESULTS: The median ED-SOFA score was two points (interquartile range: 1-4.5) and the Δ-SOFA score was 2 points (interquartile range: 0-3). The Δ-SOFA score was more powerful (area under the curve: 0.81) than the ED-SOFA score (area under the curve: 0.75) in predicting hospital mortality. Sixteen (6%) patients had a Δ-SOFA score less than 0, 116 (43%) patients had a Δ-SOFA=0-1, and 137 (51%) patients had a Δ-SOFA of at least 2 points. The probability of being alive at hospital discharge was 51 and 86.5% in Δ-SOFA of at least 2 and Δ-SOFA=0-1 groups, respectively (P<0.001). Risk factors for an increase of two or more SOFA points were age, cirrhosis, a diagnosis of sepsis, and a prolonged ED stay. CONCLUSION: SOFA and changes in the SOFA score over time are potentially useful tools for risk stratification when applied to critically ill patients admitted to ICUs from the ED.

Safety Management of a Clinical Process Using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapies in Intensive Care Unit Patients.

The failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) may improve the safety of the continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) in the intensive care unit. We use this tool in three phases: 1) Retrospective observational study. 2) A process FMEA, with implementation of the improvement measures identified. 3) Cohort study after FMEA. We included 54 patients in the pre-FMEA group and 72 patients in the post-FMEA group. Comparing the risks frequencies per patient in both groups, we got less cases of under 24 hours of filter survival time in the post-FMEA group (31 patients 57.4% vs. 21 patients 29.6%; p < 0.05); less patients suffered circuit coagulation with inability to return the blood to the patient (25 patients [46.3%] vs. 16 patients [22.2%]; p < 0.05); 54 patients (100%) versus 5 (6.94%) did not get phosphorus levels monitoring (p < 0.05); in 14 patients (25.9%) versus 0 (0%), the CRRT prescription did not appear on medical orders. As a measure of improvement, we adopt a dynamic dosage management. After the process FMEA, there were several improvements in the management of intensive care unit patients receiving CRRT, and we consider it a useful tool for improving the safety of critically ill patients.

Enteral Nutrition in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation in a Prone Position.

BACKGROUND: Patients treated with mechanical ventilation in the prone position (PP) could have an increased risk for feeding intolerance. However, the available evidence supporting this hypothesis is limited and contradictory. OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility and efficacy of enteral nutrition (EN) support and its associated complications in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in PP. METHODS: Prospective observational study including 34 mechanically ventilated intensive care patients who were turned to the prone position over a 3-year period. End points related to efficacy and safety of EN support were studied. RESULTS: In total, more than 1200 patients were admitted to the intensive care unit over a period of 3 years. Of these, 34 received mechanical ventilation in PP. The mean days under EN were 24.7 ± 12.3. Mean days under EN in the supine position were significantly higher than in PP (21.1 vs 3.6; P < .001), but there were no significant differences in gastric residual volume adjusted per day of EN (126.6 vs 189.2; P = .054) as well as diet volume ratio (94.1% vs 92.8%; P = .21). No significant differences in high gastric residual events per day of EN (0.06 vs 0.09; P = .39), vomiting per day of EN (0.016 vs 0.03; P = .53), or diet regurgitation per day of EN (0 vs 0.04; P = .051) were found. CONCLUSIONS: EN in critically ill patients with severe hypoxemia receiving mechanical ventilation in PP is feasible, safe, and not associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal complications. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.